<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Metrics: Page Views Out, Time On Site In</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlinecommunityreport.com/2007/07/metrics-page-views-out-time-on-site-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlinecommunityreport.com/2007/07/metrics-page-views-out-time-on-site-in/</link>
	<description>Online Community and Social Media Trends, Topics and Best Practices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:41:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Cohen</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinecommunityreport.com/2007/07/metrics-page-views-out-time-on-site-in/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 04:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocrdev.forumone.com/?p=222#comment-156</guid>
		<description>Good questions, Bill. This post from Salon&#039;s Machinist posits that neither page views nor time spent on site are useful measures in many contexts. For instance, as the NYTimes&#039; Bits blog points out&lt;/a&gt; some sites, like Google, have little use for either. It&#039;s clicks that produce revenue.

For online communities, perhaps there is no one metric that is most telling in all circumstances. It depends on the revenue model, objectives and/or mission of that particular community.

Here are the two articles I mentioned:
http://machinist.salon.com/blog/2007/07/11/nielsen_ratings/index.html
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/07/10/on-the-web-ratings-are-not-dollars/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good questions, Bill. This post from Salon&#8217;s Machinist posits that neither page views nor time spent on site are useful measures in many contexts. For instance, as the NYTimes&#8217; Bits blog points out some sites, like Google, have little use for either. It&#8217;s clicks that produce revenue.</p>
<p>For online communities, perhaps there is no one metric that is most telling in all circumstances. It depends on the revenue model, objectives and/or mission of that particular community.</p>
<p>Here are the two articles I mentioned:<br />
<a href="http://machinist.salon.com/blog/2007/07/11/nielsen_ratings/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://machinist.salon.com/blog/2007/07/11/nielsen_ratings/index.html</a><br />
<a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/07/10/on-the-web-ratings-are-not-dollars/" rel="nofollow">http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/07/10/on-the-web-ratings-are-not-dollars/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

