<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The State of Online Community 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlinecommunityreport.com/2008/12/the-state-of-online-community-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlinecommunityreport.com/2008/12/the-state-of-online-community-2008/</link>
	<description>Online Community and Social Media Trends, Topics and Best Practices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:41:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goms</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinecommunityreport.com/2008/12/the-state-of-online-community-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Goms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 07:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocrdev.forumone.com/?p=398#comment-266</guid>
		<description>Hi
The presentation was a nice piece of stats data collection.
I feel that if info  on why some business deny getting into Online community and a comparison of business before and after engaging in  community were added ,it would give a different dimension.
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
The presentation was a nice piece of stats data collection.<br />
I feel that if info  on why some business deny getting into Online community and a comparison of business before and after engaging in  community were added ,it would give a different dimension.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinecommunityreport.com/2008/12/the-state-of-online-community-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocrdev.forumone.com/?p=398#comment-236</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a presentation about the state of online community, not e2.0 or internal collaboration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a presentation about the state of online community, not e2.0 or internal collaboration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rotkapchen</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinecommunityreport.com/2008/12/the-state-of-online-community-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Rotkapchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocrdev.forumone.com/?p=398#comment-239</guid>
		<description>I never questioned the validity of the research, just the presentation...just as Lawrence said (better than I did).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never questioned the validity of the research, just the presentation&#8230;just as Lawrence said (better than I did).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinecommunityreport.com/2008/12/the-state-of-online-community-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocrdev.forumone.com/?p=398#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Hi Lawrence - Yes, our area of focus is on external customer communities. 

I agree that more sophisticated internal networks for enterprise are a large opportunity. Further, I think a lot of opportunity lies at the intersection points for internal and external communities. The folks at Jive (and others) are currently thinking about this.

Paula point (and delivery) that I totally disagree with is that because we have only taken a look at external customer communities (and the host governance and participation), the research is somehow invalid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lawrence &#8211; Yes, our area of focus is on external customer communities. </p>
<p>I agree that more sophisticated internal networks for enterprise are a large opportunity. Further, I think a lot of opportunity lies at the intersection points for internal and external communities. The folks at Jive (and others) are currently thinking about this.</p>
<p>Paula point (and delivery) that I totally disagree with is that because we have only taken a look at external customer communities (and the host governance and participation), the research is somehow invalid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Liu</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinecommunityreport.com/2008/12/the-state-of-online-community-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Liu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocrdev.forumone.com/?p=398#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Bill, I believe Paula&#039;s point (which I agree with) is that your preso, and the research that backs it up, is focused solely on Internet facing B2C oriented communities. There&#039;s been a growing need for communities within the intranet (E2E, between employees), and the data points, requirements, and objectives are likely different from those of B2C communities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, I believe Paula&#8217;s point (which I agree with) is that your preso, and the research that backs it up, is focused solely on Internet facing B2C oriented communities. There&#8217;s been a growing need for communities within the intranet (E2E, between employees), and the data points, requirements, and objectives are likely different from those of B2C communities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rotkapchen</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinecommunityreport.com/2008/12/the-state-of-online-community-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Rotkapchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocrdev.forumone.com/?p=398#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Slide 11 and nothing specific to internal dynamics -- as a start :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slide 11 and nothing specific to internal dynamics &#8212; as a start <img src='http://www.onlinecommunityreport.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinecommunityreport.com/2008/12/the-state-of-online-community-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocrdev.forumone.com/?p=398#comment-232</guid>
		<description>Hi Paula - I guess that makes two of us :)

I&#039;m not following your comment. I&#039;m not sure what content in the presentation led you to believe that I was advocating keeping external and internal &quot;marketplaces&quot; separated. What am I missing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paula &#8211; I guess that makes two of us <img src='http://www.onlinecommunityreport.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not following your comment. I&#8217;m not sure what content in the presentation led you to believe that I was advocating keeping external and internal &#8220;marketplaces&#8221; separated. What am I missing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rotkapchen</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinecommunityreport.com/2008/12/the-state-of-online-community-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Rotkapchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocrdev.forumone.com/?p=398#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Color me confused. Does everyone only see the relevance of communities from a W2.0 perspective? What about E2.0 for which marketing-driven anything would make no sense? The whole presentation kinda unravels when the &#039;external&#039; marketplace is considered in isolation from the &#039;internal&#039; marketplace (which would blow most marketers minds because they know &#039;marketing&#039; but not &#039;markets&#039; ala. economics).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Color me confused. Does everyone only see the relevance of communities from a W2.0 perspective? What about E2.0 for which marketing-driven anything would make no sense? The whole presentation kinda unravels when the &#8216;external&#8217; marketplace is considered in isolation from the &#8216;internal&#8217; marketplace (which would blow most marketers minds because they know &#8216;marketing&#8217; but not &#8216;markets&#8217; ala. economics).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

