Categorized | Key Resources

3 Sacred Cows About Online Community That Need to Be Challenged

3 Sacred Cows About Online Community That Need to Be Challenged
3 Online Community Misconceptions and how to stop them
You don’t own community, the community owns the community
Original intention: To stop (mostly brand) community hosts from being overly-controlling of the community
Why it is bad: No ownership = no responsibility, and no long term stewardship.
Start by listening
Original intent: Listening was an easy (and fairly passive) way to get familiar with the social web.
Why it is bad: Ok, this one isn’t necessarily bad, just a bit misguided. Start with a conversation about your goals for engaging on the social web.
Go where your community is
Original intent: Don’t just buy a platform and expect your community to show up
Why this is b

Photo cred: http://www.flickr.com/photos/skinnyde/146763376/

The sacred cows I mention below have been on my mind for several months now, but I was inspired to take action after a community management panel that I attended at SxSWi. My intention with this post is not to suggest that we do away these sacred cows, but to start to be critical of them. I fear that these 3 cows, in particular, are being accepted as gospel, and those new (and not so new) to online community building really don’t challenge them.

As with many good things gone wrong, these cows all began with good intentions.

Cow #1: You don’t own the community, the community owns the community
Original intention: To stop (mostly brand) community hosts from being overly-controlling of the community, and being too directive of community interactions.

Why this cow should be challenged: No ownership = absolution of responsibility, and weak or no long term stewardship. The host *does* own parts of the community experience, and certainly has the responsibility to create a virtual “clean, well-lit place” for their brand or organization. Perhaps a better cow would be: “You don’t own the community, but you have a responsibility to be a good host, leader and listener”. Speaking of listening…

Cow #2: Start by listening

Original intent: Listening was an easy (and fairly passive) way to get brands and organizations familiar with the social web.

Why this cow should be challenged: Ok, this one isn’t necessarily bad, just a bit misguided. My recommendation to clients is to start with a conversation about your goals for engaging on the social web. A listening strategy is key to managing a successful online presence, but brands and organizations also need to interact. Another disturbing trend I see with “just listening” is that some brands are wholesale farming out listening and interaction to their agency of choice, as opposed to creating direct brand to customer or organization to stakeholder relationships.

Cow #3: Go where your community is

Original intent: Don’t just buy a platform and expect your community to show up – (a.k.a. Build it and they will come).

Why this cow should be challenged: Many organizations are doing a poor job of evaluating the opportunity for community on their own domain, and are setting up outposts on large social sites like Facebook because it is relatively easy and (initially) inexpensive. In our “Participating int he Social Media Ecosystem” research project from January of 2010, we saw that only about 1/2 (56%) of the participants had a comprehensive social strategy in place – meaning, only 1/2 of the organizations had spent time assessing and researching where their community currently was, and the opportunities for on and off domain engagement.

Assuming that the best place to engage members of your online community is offsite (say, a Facebook fan page) is probably a big mistake, and a lost opportunity to help transform a static corporate site into a more social experience.
Those are my top 3 Sacred Cows. What do you think? And, more importantly, what are yours?

This post was written by:

Bill Johnston - who has written 213 posts on Online Community Report.


Contact the author

  • jkbennett
    Great article. Fundamentals are often forgotten. Communities are going to be hard for many corporations. I think even the biggest operations have very little in the way of well thought out strategies that cascade through the organization well. But they do tend to control things from the top down that they don't understand as well as the those charged with doing it. Communities are an excellent example of this.

    This weakness in social engagement is going to be a huge shift in the slate of players in a lot of very competitive and high value areas. I expect I will get a kick out of some of the giants making a mess of this arena.
  • awareobserver
    Couple more cows. Social Media are so important and we all have be there and rush into it. Please don't take this for granted and do the same profiling, analysis and strategy work you would otherwise. 10% or even less of registered users of almost any web community is responsible for 100% of the given online activity (posts, comments, moderation, alerts, rumors, threads).

    My investment is leveraged
    There are almost no serious demographics studies and data available as owners prefer to control access to personal data (and so they should) and often would not want "true" activity figures be divulged. There is almost no serious financial analysis of the financial efforts required to sustain, maintain, refresh, edit, moderate a social presence vs sales, branding, top of mind, shares it generates. Just as for Google advertising, this is a closed loop environment controlled by the owners who tell you traffic figures almost always in contradiction with what ComScore, Neilsen and others observe. And they control ad pricing...
  • heatherstrout
    Bill, I agree with all three of your "sacred cow" challenge statements. What's interesting is that these are all part of a larger list of items we hear over and over about how online communities *should* be created and managed. The truth is, every community implementation and management effort is different and all of them take a LOT of strategic focus and the successful ones integrate community into the fabric of the organization.

    Great catching up with you at sxswi.

    Heather | @heatherjstrout
  • I think Sacred Cow #3 more refers to not building a forum for CompanyX Widgets, when there is already a huge community of Widget users, brand agnostic, at sitex. (ie in the offline world, it's better to take your discussions to the existing Town Hall rather than start up a new one for only your discussions).

blog comments powered by Disqus

About the OC Report


The Online Community Report features best practices, strategies, research, and events for Online Community and Social Media professionals. Jim Cashel, Heather Virga, and other staff at Forum One edit the Online Community Report. Forum One provides consulting services for community strategy, design, network building, management, metrics, and social media implementation.

Event Pictures

www.flickr.com